It is currently Sun Dec 17, 2017 12:39 pm

What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

FollowersFollowers: 0
BookmarksBookmarks: 0
Views: 1137

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby Deadheart » Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:14 pm

I know we chatted once before on planetsuzy snoman, but it is still interesting to me how much similar our life experiences have been on this. I even assume we are about the same age, and have both spent time in Europe. I would imagine many people with this fetish have been adults who have had it done later in life. I wouldn't imagine most circ'd men who had it done at birth thinking anything about it, as its all they ever known. I however never had a medical problem, I did it for the cosmetic reason and improved confidence. Would be interesting to see a poll on this forum on men who had it done at birth vs men who had it done in adulthood.
Deadheart
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 02.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby snoman » Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:37 pm

Deadheart

It's one of the reasons why forums like this make me a very determined supporter. It's really nice to find a community of similar minded people - especially when a significant part of your life has been spent feeling like a freak. I've belonged to other forums and for whatever reason or another they don't/didn't really appeal to me all that much. When I found Straight Foreskin I was happy to contribute because I thought it was the closest I'd get to a place like this.

Then Voila! Gemit has created this space.

I agree with you. I think it's a rare person who was cut at birth who has this fetish, unless they come from a traditionally 'non circumcising' country. Then I could well understand this being a fetish for them. For me, my adolescence was defined by feelings of inferiority and constant social references to the cut cock. It thrilled me and made me terribly ashamed at the same time. Weird space to be for a teenager!
snoman
 
Posts: 182
Joined: 03.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby Gemlt » Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:52 pm

I'm glad that this space has been helpful for you. I went ahead and created the poll as you recommended. Feel free to create others in that space if you have any other questions.

For what it's worth, I was circumcised as an infant in a time and place (Yale Hospital in the 80s) when it was very common. I suppose that I have been "the norm" for most of my girlfriends. I can't remember any of them ever bringing it up. That said, I can assure you that if it wasn't your foreskin, adolescents would have found something to pick on. I remember being afraid to shower during gym classes in middle and high school because I was terrified of being picked on while naked. I don't think that there was even any particular features that I was afraid of being teased for. Adolescent and teenage boys (as well as girls) are just pretty sadistic people in general, and if there's absolutely anything that makes you different, they're going to pick up on it. So I sure as hell wasn't putting myself in the vulnerable position of being naked around these assholes, which meant that for about three years I was the guy that had really bad body odor for the second half of two days each week.

In regards to how someone circumcised at birth that lives in a place that is predominantly populated by circumcised males would develop a fetish for acucullophiliac females, that's somewhat tricky to explain. Ultimately, I think that it's derived from two major sources.

The first is the rise of the uncircumcised male in porn. At least in the U.S., foreskin in porn has skyrocketed over the past decade as the "post-circumcision" generation out West matures, and the importation of European productions become more typical. Although I have nothing against a guy being uncut, it's not something that I like to watch because it imparts a sense of "otherness" that makes it difficult for me to fully engage in the fantasy that I suppose pornography is intended to induce. I don't think that this alone helped me develop an interest in female acucullophiliacs, but my distaste for uncut guys in porn has definitely been snowballing for several years now. Again, this isn't to hate on intact guys out there. I don't feel this way because they're uncircumcised, I feel this way because I am circumcised.

The second and probably greater factor that lead to this fetish for me was undoubtedly the rise of the Intactivist movement. I don't know if you've read the Slate article "How Circumcision Broke the Internet", but I think it does a decent job at detailing how ubiquitous Intactivism has become. If you do a Google search for circumcision+anything, half of the top results will be anti-circumcision. If this was warranted by facts, it would be one thing, but I really don't feel that the research supports the castration complex that this fundamentalist group propagates. Nevertheless, it kind of gets under my skin (mind you, not the one that's probably since been grafted to a burn victim). The word "mutilated" comes up way too frequently. As I express in the About page on my site, I am not an enormous fan of the term "Intact", because of the association it has with the castration of animals.

It's interesting, the other day I was thinking about some drawings and paintings by Picasso that I saw at his museum in Paris. (Brief art history lesson:) In the late 1930s, Hitler made a speech in which he included modern artists in the same company as the Jews and gays. He suggested that the degenerate nature of modern art might be heritable, and recommended the sterilization of the abstract artists. Picasso appears to have responded to this threat with a period in which he retreated slightly from his cubist period to repeatedly depict the Minotaur in consort with a woman. The Minotaur in this context appears to a surrogate for Picasso's own masculinity; a sort of hypersexualized icon of his manhood. It's almost Picasso went through this phase where every day he was telling Hitler "You think you're the uber-mensch? Piss off."

I'm certainly not comparing this website to the work of one of art's greatest masters, nor has anybody threatened to castrate me. I think that there is a parallel to this story though in my own life. I suspect that a fetish for girls that prefer a cut cock is probably a response to wounded pride more than anything. It's kind of funny, but it sounds like the same thing lead yourselves to this path, though it would appear that the specifics were different.
User avatar
Gemlt
Site Admin
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 01.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby Gemlt » Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:01 pm

A light post-script: I began going through puberty around the age of 11 in the early 90's. The internet hadn't really become a big thing yet (I think each classroom was issued an old Apple computer around the same time), so erotica was fairly limited for an adolescent. As a result, I had to turn to classical art and medical texts in my parents' libraries for amusement. The latter told me that most men in the States were circumcised, which I assumed meant that most men had been circumcised for quite some time (e.g., in Italy during the Renaissance). Because my own dick very definitely did not look like those that I found in the art books, I came to believe that I must be uncircumcised for at least two or three years. I was terrified of what other people would think if they found this out, and I think that this may have contributed to my fear of sharing communal showers with other boys as described above.
User avatar
Gemlt
Site Admin
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 01.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby snoman » Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:24 am

Gemit

Interesting to read and I have to agree with you. Kids can be little monsters and you're quite right - anything different would have been a target. However, when you're the one person you know of with an anatomical difference in the entire school, well...that feels like a pretty big target!

In elementary school I got horribly teased and bullied about my foreskin. That probably laid the foundation for my own issues.

I think your views on porn pretty closely resemble my own. I tend to only look for porn where circumcision may be a theme anyway, so it's a rare clip where a guy is uncut that will hold my attention. For me too - I have nothing against uncut guys (I was one of them), but watching them work in porn isn't at all interesting to me.

I could write a lot about my feelings on the intactivist movement but it's not really the forum for it. Suffice it say, every chance I get, I will tell people about my own positive experiences with circumcision. It suddenly becomes very hard to argue some of the intactivist points when they're talking to a person who has experienced life on both sides of the fence.
snoman
 
Posts: 182
Joined: 03.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby chrisbris » Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:24 pm

Getting a girl to talk about your circed cut is very hard ...

I've found that less is more. Girls who don't know how, tend to grad the cock hard and pull the skin up and down and that hurts!

On certain days just the lightest of touches to the frenulum from the scar to the head drive me insane. I can be 'on the edge' for a long time without cumming, whcih wasn't posible before I was cut.
Recently I 've found that the upper rim of the head is sensitive to soft touching and part of the scar on the underside.
I have to admit that when I got my third circ, i lost an amazing hot spot where the frenulum and the scar meet. The sacrifice for a tight cut. Big pity.
chrisbris
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 09.2017
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby Gemlt » Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:43 pm

chrisbris wrote:Getting a girl to talk about your circed cut is very hard ...

I've found that less is more. Girls who don't know how, tend to grad the cock hard and pull the skin up and down and that hurts!

On certain days just the lightest of touches to the frenulum from the scar to the head drive me insane. I can be 'on the edge' for a long time without cumming, whcih wasn't posible before I was cut.
Recently I 've found that the upper rim of the head is sensitive to soft touching and part of the scar on the underside.
I have to admit that when I got my third circ, i lost an amazing hot spot where the frenulum and the scar meet. The sacrifice for a tight cut. Big pity.


I'm genuinely sorry for your loss. The aversion to the frenulum is one of the points of many circumfetishes that I really don't connect with (although, as always, this is a judgement free zone if that's your thing). Although I wouldn't describe my frenulum as particularly pronounced, the part that remains is easily the most sensitive part of my dick. Like yourself, my girl can lick it for a good half hour or so keeping me right at the edge of cumming, but without losing control. Although it's possible for me to orgasm without frenulum contact, the orgasms that I have when my frenulum is being stimulated are definitely many many times more intense, and can radiate throughout my pelvis and abdomen.

I wonder if you'll recover some sensitivity in what frenulum remains. One of the major fallacies of the intactivist arguement is in its obsession with the penis alone. In essence, they would propose that without the nerves within the foreskin, a person is not capable of as intense an orgasm. This theory betrays an ignorance of basic neurophysiology; namely the concept of plasticity. In essence, each nerve leads to (or from) a specific part of your brain. If you cut off your middle finger, for a little while the part of your brain that received sensory information from that finger will be inactive. After time, however, the brain-which wants to be doing something-will reassign this region to other tasks, like receiving information from your index and ring fingers. One would assume that the same concept applies to the penis.

When Jennifer Bossio was actively conducting her research on the comparative sensitivity of cut and uncut men, I wrote to her about my theory, but unfortunately never received a response. I'll just have to wait for the next researcher to stumble across this topic. It seems like someone decides to conduct a comparative sensitivity study every five years or so (of course never with replicable results or particularly statistically significant findings).
User avatar
Gemlt
Site Admin
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 01.2016
Gender: None specified

Re: What's Your Favorite Form of Stimulation?

Postby chrisbris » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:52 am

Gemlt wrote:
chrisbris wrote:Getting a girl to talk about your circed cut is very hard ...

I've found that less is more. Girls who don't know how, tend to grad the cock hard and pull the skin up and down and that hurts!

On certain days just the lightest of touches to the frenulum from the scar to the head drive me insane. I can be 'on the edge' for a long time without cumming, whcih wasn't posible before I was cut.
Recently I 've found that the upper rim of the head is sensitive to soft touching and part of the scar on the underside.
I have to admit that when I got my third circ, i lost an amazing hot spot where the frenulum and the scar meet. The sacrifice for a tight cut. Big pity.


I'm genuinely sorry for your loss. The aversion to the frenulum is one of the points of many circumfetishes that I really don't connect with (although, as always, this is a judgement free zone if that's your thing). Although I wouldn't describe my frenulum as particularly pronounced, the part that remains is easily the most sensitive part of my dick. Like yourself, my girl can lick it for a good half hour or so keeping me right at the edge of cumming, but without losing control. Although it's possible for me to orgasm without frenulum contact, the orgasms that I have when my frenulum is being stimulated are definitely many many times more intense, and can radiate throughout my pelvis and abdomen.

I wonder if you'll recover some sensitivity in what frenulum remains. One of the major fallacies of the intactivist arguement is in its obsession with the penis alone. In essence, they would propose that without the nerves within the foreskin, a person is not capable of as intense an orgasm. This theory betrays an ignorance of basic neurophysiology; namely the concept of plasticity. In essence, each nerve leads to (or from) a specific part of your brain. If you cut off your middle finger, for a little while the part of your brain that received sensory information from that finger will be inactive. After time, however, the brain-which wants to be doing something-will reassign this region to other tasks, like receiving information from your index and ring fingers. One would assume that the same concept applies to the penis.

When Jennifer Bossio was actively conducting her research on the comparative sensitivity of cut and uncut men, I wrote to her about my theory, but unfortunately never received a response. I'll just have to wait for the next researcher to stumble across this topic. It seems like someone decides to conduct a comparative sensitivity study every five years or so (of course never with replicable results or particularly statistically significant findings).


The senstivity in my frenulum is more or less the same as before the last cut, I just lost a small hot spot right on the previous scarline. I wanted to keep that and get them to leave all the inner skin, but like others here, the surgeon persuaded me that he knew best .....
I was uncut till 30 years old and the orgasms I have are the same or even better now I'm cut. Because I can keep going longer edging I have incredibly intense orgasms. There hasn't been a time when I've ever regretted being cut, even enduring 4 operations. It has transformed my sex life !
chrisbris
 
Posts: 44
Joined: 09.2017
Gender: None specified

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests