Maybe this is an odd question, but does anybody else have a tendency to prefer porn if the man’s penis looks more like your own? I think Dave Chappell’s remarks about something along this line of thought in one of his recent stand ups, and so something that I’d been vaguely aware of has been kind of percolating in the back of my mind since then.
I think I’ve mentioned elements of this a long time back, but part of my own interest in acucullophilia began out of mere distaste for uncut dicks that I saw in porn. Again, I don’t really care about a guy’s status at the end of the day, but it’s pretty much guaranteed to turn me off if the guy in porn is uncut, even if his foreskin’s fully retracted. I’ve become pretty positive that this is largely because it’s extremely difficult for me to fantasize that I’m the guy in the porn. Likewise, I guess I virtually never watch porn with black guys in them, regardless of circumcision status. I’m the furthest thing from racist, but the dick just looks too different from my own for my fantasies to work. This is almost never a problem for me when the guy’s cut and white/tan, even though there’s a spectrum of penile appearances wildly different than my own.
I will admit that there are a few male stars that I tend to avoid, although I might still watch their stuff if the female model(s) are my type. Mike Adriano
comes to mind; partially because he has this pale monotone dick that has this kind of plasticy dildoish lifelessness that sometimes kind of weirds me out. It doesn’t help that his videos pretty much always involve a ridiculous amount of deep throat gagging, and also a ton of oral-anal action, which just ain’t my thing. The rest of it isn’t as bad, but I definitely feel like he’s overrated. Another cut guy who doesn’t really work for me is whomever the man is that shoots the CreampieThais
/etc. videos, because his glans look really odd to me. The head of his penis looks almost like it’s being pulled down by an exceptionally tight frenulum, but if I had to guess, I’d say that I’m almost certain that he’s had reconstructive work done to repair hypospadias.
As much as I like stars like Bruce Venture
and Sean Lawless
for their distinctly circumcised dicks, they’re penises have almost cartoonishly exaggerated features. The stark color contrast on Venture’s shaft, as well as a dorsal vein as thick as most women’s pinky fingers, and then Lawless’s ginormous glans/shaft circumference ratio are the sort of variables that come to mind. I’m never disappointed to see them, but they’re just a little too much of everything to be my perfect fantasy standin.
This brings me back to the topic that I began with, which is the ideal penis that I want to see in porn-my penis avatar if you will. For a long time, Peter North
was a favorite. Sure, his dick could be super tan, and (the inverse of Lawless), North’s glans seemed kind of small compared to a beer can-thick shaft. Nevertheless, it was the close enough in appearance to my own to work, and the man’s cumshots were pretty epic
. I once saw someone comment that his prostate must be the size of a grapefruit, and I’d guess they’re in the right ballpark. I remember reading comments where people claimed that uncut men must experience more pleasure because of the size of their cumshots (admitted, never guaranteed to be real) in porn, and thinking that these people must never have seen the work of North (or myself in my teens and early 20s if I hadn’t cum in more than nine or ten hours).
Lately, I’m digging the work of Logan Long
, whose penis has slightly more balanced ratios albeit being disproportionately large for his body (but hey, he’s a pornstar, and this isn’t a bad trait for a penis avatar). He’s also got a Mogen-style cut and a hint of frenulum, so we’ve also got that in common. In addition, Long has a kind of dorky hipster look that makes him a little easier for me to associate with than the macho body builder types. Anyways, definitely expect to see him popping up frequently in the comic strips I’ve started making.Matt Sloan
’s a close second for my favorite penis avatar. I’d say that his dick actually looks even more like my own (although I’m not claiming to be as big as any of the aforementioned men) because his penis is a little less tan than Long’s, but still has the V-shaped scar and frenulum fragment. I will admit, it’s still hard for me to get past Sloan’s face though, which I can only describe as peculiarly “pretty”, but I’ve never been one to focus on faces. He’s understandably mistaken for being a trans performer by people that see him for the first time, and is becoming a popular star in the MILF porn category. As an aside, it’s pretty hard to find his stuff-I’m guessing he’s really new to the scene. The most substantial post I could find about Sloan was on LPSG
(Large Penis Support Group), and if you’ve ever wondered if we’re overly obsessive on here, spend five minutes on there and you’ll start to feel vanilla again. The measures that people go to in order to estimate the precise dimensions of pornstar’s cocks (e.g., comparing their penises to nearby objects, costars hands, etc.) are remarkable. There are some circumcision discussions on there for those of you who are interested, but I don’t remember finding any particularly interesting when I perused the forum a couple of years ago.
So there you have it. I could go on I’m sure. Now that I’ve started thinking about it, I almost give each pornstar a subconscious grade based on how well our penises could pass for each other, and others definitely come to mind. That said, this is already an extremely long-winded post on a rather odd topic. I guess back to my original question, does anybody else do this, and if so, who’s your penis avatar (it’s okay, I know it’s Bruce Venture or Sean Lawless for at least a few of you
)? If not, is there some other neurotic process like this that you follow when you look at or watch porn? I’m realizing that I’m probably putting a fair amount of subconscious thought into making sure my mirror neurons
fire just right...