brexiter wrote:It's logical isn't it JamesS. If you have less skin to work with your dick has to make up for it. It's just a little side con, what's the cost of it... for me it's being as tight as I could circumcise myself, which was what I wanted. I wanted my erections to be rock hard with next to no skin movement. I don't participate in casual sex but if I did this routine of shaving would feel more like a chore. I'm a bit of a traditional guy you see, no sex until I'm in a comfortable place in a relationship. So the persistence of me having to groom this issue will be more so to worry about when I have to consider making sex as enjoyable as possible for my partner, which I have to assume would be with a penis that doesn't hair on it lol
Yeah it totally makes sense. There’s less skin on the shaft, so it takes some from the balls. I just never made the connection before seeing this thread. Not a big deal to me, just a part of life, haha.